>>22822978>anyone have experience with pro.chem?
I won't be buying again, because they're slightly under-dosed according to Underground Anabolics (google it, there's a pdf version of it somewhere), they analysed one of their vials with a mass spectrometer.
So I don't feel too comfortable buying a mediocre product, ROHM was rated better, but still only considered "acceptable" even though they're slightly under-dosed too.
Not just that, if you went by the guidelines for buying orals in that book, you could see that were low quality and I don't want to reward UGL's for churning out shit products.
I'd happily pay more if it meant better standards.